It’s been a while since I’ve put a blog post together. I’ve been busy with work and wedding planning, and I have been a bit absent from the world of diabetes. For instance, I’ve missed a number of #OzDoc weekly chats because I keep forgetting it’s on!

Anyway, I’ve decided to do FebFast. No, not FebFast Caffeine or FebFast Digital – I don’t think I could manage those. I’m going to be doing FebFast Alcohol.

This means I’m going to be taking a 28 day break from alcohol. As they say on their website, it can be easy to “feel a little sluggish after a big Christmas, New Year summer holiday or Australia Day”, and that describes me. I’m in a stage where I’m trying to both save money (more needed for the house, planning a wedding and travel plans) and improve my fitness (I’m about ~10kgs over my ideal playing weight).

These days, I’m not a huge drinker. I do like a beer, especially for the taste, but I generally only drink at functions or sports events. On the odd ocassion I will have a big night, but not often. Very rarely would I have a drink at home without having some particular reason for doing so. Still, February contains a friend’s 30th, a few sporting events and a few other occassions where I would ordinarily have a beer or two.

What does this mean for my diabetes?

Well, the FebFast mantra is “a pause for the better”. I think this applies to how alcohol and diabetes sit together.

I like to tell myself that alcohol doesn’t have an effect on my diabetes. But in all honesty, it does. Of course it’s possible to drink with diabetes, but it does impact on my BGL’s – sometimes unpredictably. Big highs, crashing lows, temp basals, more temp basals.

A pause for the better means putting the position of alcohol into perspective. February will demonstrate the impact that alcohol often has on my BGL’s, diabetes management and life more broadly. To counter the absense of alcohol, I am also trying to include more exercise into my routine. Yesterday I shot the basketball for a good 45 minutes. Today I’m going to walk Cody the super dog around the lake. Tomorrow – something else.

So, cheers to February. A month of no alcohol and more exercise.


Dodgy infusion sets and Melbourne weather

Today has been good fun. Well…not really. 

Here’s a bit of a rundown.

Last night

  • 9pm – 4.4
    • All good.
  • 11pm – 11.7
    • Bit high – not sure why. Correct and bed.
  • 2am – 21.4
    • Woke up feeling like death warmed up. Strange. Very rarely do I hit the magic two-zero. I had been at a work function during the afternoon and then went out for a pub meal with friends after work, so I thought perhaps the food had taken a while to kick in, but it really didn’t make sense and I was confident of my dosing. Still, it was 2am so I wasn’t thinking too straight and just did a correction bolus, had a few (thousand) glasses of water and tried to get back to sleep. 


  • 7am – 14.0
    • Normally my correction boluses are pretty spot on, so I was surprised that it hadn’t come down more. I still felt a bit average, but I figured (wrongly) that it would all come down in the process of time. So off I went to work.
  • 9am – 14.1
    • Uh oh. Started to worry now. I skipped breakfast this morning too, so that can’t be it. Maybe it’s the heat? Let’s correct again and see what happens (hindsight makes me wonder what on earth I was thinking). 
  • 11am – 18.0
    • Oh crap. Maybe I should look at my pump site…..Idiot! It was basically falling completely out. When was the last time I’ve actually received any insulin properly? I’m sure it was okay this morning….wasn’t it? Maybe it wasn’t! Fortunately, I always have a spare pen of Novorapid with me. Pulled that out of my bag and did a correction bolus.
  • 12pm – 15.3
    • GAH! Still high. The pen of Novorapid did have a massive air bubble in it – potentially a result of the crazy heat that Melbourne has been experiencing? After doing some testing and investigating, I came to the conclusion that the pen was sort of working, but not really. The air bubble did seem to affect the actual flow and pressure of the insulin delivery and as a result I’m not sure how much insulin was actually coming out. Long story short, I thought I definitely couldn’t trust the insulin pen. But I had heaps to do at work and really couldn’t afford to go home. Fortunately, I normally keep a few spare infusion sets around my desk for when these situations arise. Cue furious searching around. Success! I found an infusion set in one of my drawers. Sure, it might be the 80cm mio instead of the 60cm that I prefer, but it was an infusion set! A sneaky set change at my desk and voilà. Crisis averted. 
  • 1pm – 12.7
    • [Down down, BSL’s are going down. I wanted to be a bit careful though, so avoided lunch until I knew I was in safer territory].
  • 2pm – 8.8
    • Under 10! Finally, I felt safe to eat lunch, which incidentally was my first meal for 20 hours. I was pretty hungry.
  • 3.30pm – 7.8
    • Under 8!
  • 4.30pm – 5.2
    • Mission accomplished. 

Lesson 1 – Act on instinct at 2am when my BSL was 21, not fall back to sleep!
Lesson 2 – Check infusion set in morning. Properly. 
Lesson 3 – Check backup Novorapid pens more regularly. 
Lesson 4 – Restock back up infusion sets. ASAP. 

Anyway, in normal circumstances I would have sorted myself out when my BSL was 21. I blame the Melbourne weather and my relatively terrible sleep over the past few nights. Three straight days over weather over 40 degrees celcius cannot be good for the brain and general thought processing about diabetes stuff

Some examples of Melbourne below:






Merry Christmas folks.

Merry Christmas to everyone that happens to read this blog of random thoughts about diabetes. I don’t do it for the reader numbers or page hits – I have always written this blog as a mechanism to put my thoughts on [electronic] paper.

But I certainly appreciate people that do take their time to read my blog from time to time.

Wishing you all the very best and a happy, healthy and safe Christmas.



Dexcom – trial two.

Today I pulled off the Dexcom sensor that I had on loan from my educator. Although it lasted 23 days, much longer than the recommended wear time, my skin looks entirely fine. Like last time, it stayed on with the help of plenty of Opsite. Probably even better than last time.

As seen on with the photo below, the Dexcom had no signs of losing accuracy. This photo was yesterday afternoon.

I took it off mostly to get it back to my educator before Christmas, so I do wonder how much longer it would last. A sensor lasting for a month or so almost makes it affordable enough to do on a more I going basis. Almost.

Whilst the Dexcom provides a brilliant complement to finger prick checks and so forth, wearing both a pump and a Dexcom can be a bit draining. I’m thinking of having a day off the pump tomorrow, just to freshen up a bit. It will be my first since getting the pump.
Should be interesting!

5 ways the World Diabetes Congress can better engage consumers


I’ve been to a lot of conferences in work and volunteer roles. As an attendee, an organiser and a speaker. I’ve seen good conferences, bad conferences, and everything in between.

Attending three days of the World Diabetes Congress in Melbourne as a “consumer” was a different and enjoyable experience. It was brilliant to have this global congress in my backyard of Melbourne, and to have the opportunity to attend purely as a interested consumer.

The Congress has previously been targeted at healthcare professionals, researchers, scientists, policy makers, government representatives and product/pharmaceutical companies. I understand that in recognition of the active, and growing, diabetes consumer lobby, this was the first time people with diabetes have been able to attend the conference with a specific consumer registration.

It’s also common sense.

However, to improve the overall experience for people with diabetes, I think there are five clear opportunities for the World Diabetes Congress to better engage with consumers in Vancouver 2015. This is not intended as a critique, but just some thoughts based on my experience.

1. Consumer only, consumer oriented sessions

One of the reasons I turned to social media as a tool to support my diabetes management was to learn more about how other people live with diabetes – through blogs and twitter in particular. Take that concept, and apply it to a global in-person experience like a World Diabetes Congress, and there is a massive opportunity to provide a great experience for consumers. You just need to Google “diabetes blogs” to uncover thousands of great stories about how people live with diabetes, their thoughts on government policy and ways that technology can better suit our needs – certainly enough to construct three days worth of entertaining and informative sessions.

I think there was an attempt to do this through the “Living with Diabetes” stream of the Congress, however there were some speakers in this stream talking about how other people –  their patients, their communities or their populations – live with diabetes, as opposed to them personally. It should come as no surprise that Kerri’s session about Living with diabetes in a busy world” was one of the busiest I attended, as it focused purely on life before and life with, diabetes.

Consumer only sessions would encourage more people living with diabetes to attend, and feel like an active participant in the Congress, rather than just a topic of conversation. Granted, I understand the notion that if the session was closed off to other delegates, we are missing the opportunity to showcase the realities of living with diabetes, but I think this needs to be weighed up with the opportunity to form connections with others, and to discuss matters of shared importance from a mutually shared playing field.

2. Better integration of social media

So, there was a hashtag…#WDC2013. The hashtag was pretty well utilised, particularly by consumers discussing the key takeaway messages they took from some sessions (not to mention organise coordinated coffee runs). But social media could have been better integrated into the congress to provide opportunities for consumers and others, to have discussions online, and potentially then in person.

How about:

  • providing twitter walls in rooms to provide a live demonstration of how people with diabetes use twitter to discuss important issues;
  • allowing people to ask questions or provide feedback in-session via twitter;
  • offering a twitter masterclass for people wanting to know more about social media and twitter for conferences on the morning of the first congress day;
  • providing twitter handles for speakers in the program;
  • including best practice guidelines of how to use the hashtag in the congress bag; or
  • listing twitter usernames on nametags.

It’s no secret that diabetes consumers are increasingly using twitter to engage with other people with diabetes, product companies and diabetes organisations. We want to feel involved, and perhaps more importantly, have the opportunity to be involved. Social media can do this if properly integrated into the congress, and may also provide the non-social media user, or even the social media cynic, with a better appreciation of why and how we do use it for positive purposes.

3. Re-design of the exhibition hall

Consumers were restricted access from the exhibition hall, containing product companies, charities, support organisations, government agencies and other businesses.

The back of the consumer pass read as follows:

 Following Australian legislation (Therapeutic Goods Act 1989; Therapeutic Goods regulation 1990 and Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code) prescription medicines can only be advertised to health professionals; therefore the special Australian consumer day rate does not permit you to access the commercial trade display in bays 11 to 16 in the Melbourne Exhibition Centre. Non-compliance will result in exemption from the conference.

The irony was, of course, that people with diabetes were able to access the exhibition hall if they were an exhibitor, part of the IDF Young Leaders Program or if they bought a different form of registration. Further, consumers were allowed access into the Diabetes Cafe, that provided a clear view of the Exhibition Hall – including the names of some prescription medicines. It all felt a bit like The Simpsons episode with the velvet rope. More importantly, there were a number of organisations in that exhibition hall that were not promoting prescription medicines. JDRF, Diabetes Counselling Online, the Type 1 Diabetes Network and Diabetes Australia, just to name a few. Not to mention the 5 different companies offering on-the-spot HbA1c testing.

Sure, it is important to follow regulations within legislation, but it is equally important to consider how some creativity can be utilised to ensure consumers do not feel like they are. The Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre is a big place and it would be undeniably simple to separate the room into two sections – one including prescription medicines, and one without. Problem solved.

This would provide a win for consumers – to learn more about what diabetes companies and organisations are working on, but also a win for product companies and diabetes organisations to promote their work, products (prescription medicines aside) and offerings to consumers.

Besides, consumers love freebies.

4. Improved use of language

Sure, the IDF can’t control or mandate the use of language by speakers at the congress, but if the IDF doesn’t set the standard of best-practice language in a setting like this Congress, then who will?

I know many consumers were frustrated with the use of words like compliance and sufferer, or sessions where the implication – intended or otherwise – was that some people with diabetes were somehow deviating from a simple formula. This language shows a misunderstanding of how people perceive their diabetes and how we would like to be talked to and talked about.

The establishment and recommendation of guidelines for language by presenters would make consumers feel more comfortable in sessions. Diabetes Australia has made a good start to this through the development of a Language Position Statement, and the application of these guidelines would support a shared understanding of the lived experience.

5. Provision of a relaxed space for consumers to chat

There was some great sessions at WDC 2013, but like any Congress, it was as much about the sessions as it was the discussions that happen in the breaks. The difference is, that consumers are not necessarily networking with a professional intent in mind, but more to draw upon the benefits of peer support. 

Ultimately, my highlight of the congress was catching up with friends, both old and new, that live with diabetes, but I was fortunate to know a number of people before attending the event. So I was thinking, if I was a consumer attending without knowing anyone, what would support me to meet people with diabetes. Well – probably a designated relaxed space for consumers to come together, grab a coffee and have a chat. Not everyone feels comfortable in a “support group” – myself included, but many people just love having a chat to someone else that understands.

Research is continually showing that peer support is a positive influence on people living with diabetes but unfortunately, these experiences usually feel few and far between. If the World Diabetes Congress is to really hit the mark for diabetes consumers, it needs to both provide sessions that are relevant and suitable, but also capitalise on the fact that a range of consumers are in the one place at the one time.

The success of a social event on the Tuesday night demonstrates the need to support consumer interaction. Over thirty people got together on Tuesday night to catch up, have a drink, meet new people and participate in a live #OzDoc tweet chat. Imagine the possibilities if this was truly embedded in the Congress?

So whilst participating in a Congress can be quite exhausting, engagement with other people with diabetes can be energizing. And if you haven’t noticed the trend by now – many people with diabetes like talking to other people with diabetes.

Also, there were some sessions that highlighted how fortunate Australia is to have a health system that for the most part, looks after us folk with diabetes. The disparity between countries like Australia and many other countries in terms of access to healthcare, insulin and even basic diabetes management support is stark. Georgie has covered some of these issues.

To solve these issues takes significant political commitment, ingenuity and of course, money. I’d like to see the funds raised from consumer registrations collected and utilised to support people with diabetes in developing countries, or countries struck by natural disaster, or to a program like Life For A Child. It may not be a lot of money, but I think it’s the right thing to do from a social responsibility perspective.

So, there you have it. A few thoughts based on my experiences as to how consumers can be better catered for in the World Diabetes Congress. I enjoyed my experience at the Congress, but I think consumers can ask for, and expect more from the World Diabetes Congress in future iterations.

If you went to WDC2013, I’d love to hear your thoughts. Alternatively – if you decided not to attend as a person with diabetes, I’d love to hear why.

Good luck Vancouver!

Disclaimer: I funded my attendance for day 1 of the Congress, however I was also there as a representative of the Type 1 Diabetes Network. I attended days 2 and 3 of the Congress as part of the Diabetes Australia Young Leaders Program, however after three massive days, I don’t feel very young! .

The great hypo hangover of World Diabetes Congress 2013 – Day 1/2

Last night, after the first proper day of the World Diabetes Congress in my beloved hometown of Melbourne, this hypo happened.


As you can see, I was low and asleep for about an hour without waking, which was slightly scary.

I normally wake up very easily for overnight hypos, but you can seen by that graph (I have the Dexcom on loan from my diabetes educator and last night just reaffirmed the importance of CGM tech, even if it took a while for me to respond) it took me some time to wake up to the Dexcom yelling at me that I was low. And really low – the finger prick check registered 2.5.

I’m very rarely 2.5.

What caused it? I can only assume it was due to a hectic day which went as follows:

  • Woke up at 5am
  • Left home at 6am
  • Got to Melbourne Exhibition and Convention Centre at 7am
  • Set-up the Type 1 Diabetes Network exhibition stall
  • Essentially was on the stall all day with some other T1DN folk
  • Ran to my car, got changed into my suit and jumped on two trams to get to the showcase work function of the year (massive blood sugar rise during this function, presumably a bit of stress!)
  • Had a chat to some people at the function
  • Got back out onto the streets of Melbourne and ran across the Southbank foot bridge to get to the #OzDoc meet-up and live in-person yet online tweet chat
  • Got a beer
  • Met some new folk from Oz, but also some from Nigeria, Germany and the UK
  • Had a late night coffee
  • Got home at 12.30pm
  • I’ve spent the second day of WDC 2013 with a huge hypo hangover that is only now subsiding.

    But it’s been a great two days already. The Type 1 Diabetes Network launched a new website that acts as the culmination of a lot of hard work some some dedicated volunteers. In particular, this includes the rewritten and redesigned Starter Kit for people newly diagnosed with type 1. An older version of the Starter Kit was something that made me feel more comfortable about my diabetes, so I was pleased and proud to see the new version out there for the public, and I hope it has the same impact for others.

    The #OzDOC twitter chat was brilliant as well. Whilst I was slightly distracted after a huge day, it was great to walk into a room of people – some familiar faces and some new ones – all talking about their experiences with diabetes, regardless of type 1 or type 2. It’s one thing talking to people online. It’s even more fun chatting in person trying to solve all the world’s problems and talk about how Australia is going to win the cricket.

    So much to see, so many sessions to attend and so many people to talk to at this conference. In fact, it’s slightly overwhelming to sit in some sessions with about 20 other people with diabetes that I would consider friends, given I barely knew another person with diabetes until a few years ago!

    Hoping fora better nights sleep tonight. Meanwhile, some photos from the Type 1 Diabetes Network stall below:




    Disclaimer: I funded my attendance for Day 1 of the Congress, however I was also there as a representative of the Type 1 Diabetes Network. I am attending days 2 and 3 of the Congress as part of the Diabetes Australia Young Leaders Program.

    Retention of drivers license

    I was always confident this would be fine given a relatively stable hba1c and recent eye examination that came up with no issues. But it is always good to get the confirmation in the mail given the recent changes to the Fitness to Drive interpretations for people with diabetes that have attracted so much attention over the past 12-18 months. I’m glad not only for the purposes of actually getting around but particularly given I actually quite enjoy driving.

    But gee, they are a bit blunt and robotic with the confirmation letter, aren’t they?


    Changing lancets…

    Yesterday I received an email newsletter from a diabetes product company stating “Changing the lancet every time you take a blood sample is important”, with a summary of the hygienic reasons behind why this is the case.

    Now I’m not disputing the science behind this, as that is well beyond my jurisdiction, but as a person living with type 1, this email annoyed me.

    I’m happy to concede that I certainly do not change my lancet as much as I perhaps “should”. The email from the product company included a quick poll, with the option of “How many times do you use a single lancet?” Let’s just say I chose “more than 10 times”. But at the same time I’m pretty sure that I’ve never met a person with diabetes that changes their lancet every damn time.

    Let’s do some quick maths.

    I check my blood sugar about 10-12 times a day. Sometimes more. I like to know where my BGL is at. Knowledge is power and all that jazz.

    If I was to change a lancet every time I did one of these checks, that is:

  • 10 – 12 lancets a day.
  • 70 – 84 lancets a week.
  • 280 – 336 lancets a month.
  • 3,640 – 4,368 lancets a year.
  • Hm. Yeah. No.

    Not only is this a lot of lancets, it’s damn expensive.

    It’s simply not practical or realistic to expect people with diabetes to use thousands and thousands and thousands of lancets a year. In fact, I think setting such a lofty standard shows a lack of understanding of the day-to-day experience with diabetes, and the practicalities of incorporating blood sugar checks into already busy lives amongst counting carbs, exercise, health professional appointments, treating hypos, correcting highs and everything else.

    So what’s the answer? Like most things, I think it requires a balance.

    A bit of realism and empathy from product companies would help. There is a lot involved in managing diabetes and to be honest, the issue of re-using a lancet is not on my radar, at least until my fingers start to hurt. Keeping a lancet for a period of time might not be ideal as per scientific guidelines, but it doesn’t make anyone a “bad diabetic” and it’s important to avoid this perception in language. We need to make BGL checks as easy as possible, to encourage regular checks. That said, I need to realise my fingertips are not made of steel, and do the small, albeit tedious task of changing a lancet more regularly.

    Coffee time.

    Note: I haven’t mentioned the product company because I don’t think that’s the issue. I use the companies lancing device and have used many of their meters in the past. The issue is more about the understanding the embeds to be continually developed between people with diabetes and the product companies that for the most part, do a good job in supporting us.